A- de 2023
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jorge Enrique Ibáñez Najar
✓Claimant Ricardo Andres Rodriguez Novoa
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Improcedente
- Diferencias entre peticiones administrativas y peticiones judiciales
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Con el presente auto se RECHAZA, por improcedente, la solicitud formulada por un ciudadano, relacionada con la remisión al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca o la autoridad judicial que se considere competente, de los documentos que contienen su insistencia de expedición de copias de la reseña esquemática del expediente T-9128363.
Dicha decisión se adopta porque lo pretendido es de índole administrativo y no judicial.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- RESUELVE
- ÚNICO. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de remitir al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca o a la autoridad judicial que se considere competente los documentos que contienen la insistencia presentada por el señor Ricardo Andrés Rodríguez Novoa, en relación con la solicitud de expedición de copia de la reseña esquemática del expediente T-9.128.363, conforme a lo señalado en esta providencia.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.